Top Carta Alternatives in 2026
Here for Carta itself? See the full Carta profile, pricing & reviews →
Suggest a change- If you're actively migrating off Carta and want a like-for-like 409A and compliance feature set with real prices posted up front, choose Pulley. Pulley publishes flat annual prices for its Startup and Growth tiers, bundles 409A valuations and option exercises into Growth, and offers a free trial that loads your existing Carta data.
- If you're a European company or want a genuinely free cap table for up to 50 stakeholders, choose Ledgy. Ledgy's Launch plan is free forever to 50 stakeholders and the platform is built around EU and UK equity and compliance rules from the start.
- If you plan to keep adding employees, advisors, and contractors and don't want each one to trigger a price increase, choose Mantle. Mantle charges a flat annual fee regardless of stakeholder count, so growing your cap table never pushes you into a pricier tier the way headcount-based pricing does.
- If you're a UK company running EMI, CSOP, or growth share schemes rather than US-style 409A valuations, choose Vestd. Vestd is built around UK company law and HMRC submissions, with EMI and CSOP workflows that a US-first tool doesn't cover.
- If you want the lowest published per-stakeholder price and a 409A valuation from the same vendor without a sales call, choose Eqvista. Eqvista's Premium Cap Table is $2 per stakeholder per month and its 409A bundle starts at $990 a year with unlimited updates, both posted on the pricing page.
- If you have a 25-40 stakeholder cap table and want two 409A valuations bundled in each year at the lowest price among tools that include one, choose Cake Equity. Cake's Team plan is $2,750/year for up to 40 stakeholders with 2 bundled 409A valuations a year, beating Pulley's Growth plan on price ($3,500/year for the same 40 stakeholders) and beating Mantle's Growth plan ($3,000/year, 1 bundled 409A) on both price and valuation count.
- If your cap table already lives in Carta's format and your investors, auditors, and 409A reviewers expect that, choose stay on Carta. no alternative here matches Carta's near-universal familiarity with VCs and auditors, and migrating a cap table has real switching costs that only pay off if the pricing problem is bad enough to justify them.
Carta is the default cap table platform for a reason. Most VCs, lawyers, and auditors already know how to read a Carta cap table, and the free Launch plan is a real product for companies under 25 stakeholders and $1M raised. The friction shows up once you outgrow that free tier: every paid plan is a custom quote, there's no price list to check yourself against, and customer reviews describe renewal increases that catch teams off guard, in one case a jump from $99 to $3,000.
The alternatives below all do the same core job: cap table management, option grants and vesting, and (on most of them) 409A valuations and compliance forms like Rule 701 and Form 3921. Where they differ is pricing model, region, and how much you have to negotiate to find out what you'll actually pay.
Carta alternatives compared
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free option | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulley | Early-stage startups that want a straightforward cap table without Carta's reputation for aggressive upsells | $1200/seat/yr | No | October 2025 |
| LedgyBest for European startups | European startups that want a cap table platform built around EU/UK equity and compliance rules rather than a US-first product | Free tier + custom | Yes | April 2026 |
| MantleBest free alternative | Early-stage founders who want a real cap table on a free plan instead of a trial | Free tier + custom | Yes | June 2026 |
| Cake EquityBest value for a mid-size cap table needing multiple 409As a year | Early-stage startups that want a free or low-cost cap table before they need 409A valuations | $1000/yr | Yes | July 2026 |
| EqvistaBest value once you need a 409A | Early-stage founders who want cap table software and their 409A valuation from the same vendor instead of coordinating two | $2/seat/mo | Yes | May 2026 |
| VestdBest for UK share schemes | UK companies running EMI, CSOP, or growth share schemes who want HMRC valuations and submissions handled inside the same platform | GBP 2200/seat/yr | No | June 2026 |
Why teams switch from Carta
Renewal pricing can jump sharply and without warning
G2 reviewers describe unannounced increases at renewal, including one account moving from $99 to $3,000.
No public pricing past the free Launch tier
Build, Grow, and Scale all require a sales demo and a custom quote based on stakeholder count and add-ons, so you can't compare Carta against a competitor's list price without talking to sales first.
Core features like 409A valuations and GAAP/IFRS reporting sit behind the higher tiers
Board meetings, 409A valuations, and ASC 718/IFRS reporting are only available on Grow and Scale, not on the mid-tier Build plan, forcing an upgrade once a company needs standard compliance work.
The best Carta alternatives, ranked
Pulley

Pulley was built specifically as a Carta alternative, and it shows in both pricing and onboarding. Startup is $1,200/year for your first 25 stakeholders, and Growth is $3,500/year for 40 stakeholders with 409A valuations, option exercises, and Rule 701 and Form 3921 support included rather than sold separately. Both prices sit on the public pricing page, so you can compare against a Carta quote before you commit. Switching teams get a free trial with their existing cap table data already migrated in, and onboarding is concierge-assisted. The tradeoffs are real: there's no free plan, so a 25-stakeholder cap table costs $1,200/year from day one, and stakeholder caps mean you can outgrow Startup or Growth into a quote-only Enterprise tier. One G2 reviewer also flagged that cancelling isn't self-service. For teams that want the closest thing to a drop-in Carta replacement with visible pricing, Pulley is the strongest starting point.
Pros
- + Both paid tiers show real numbers on the pricing page instead of forcing a sales call for basic cap table access
- + 409A valuations and option exercises are included in Growth rather than sold as costly add-ons
- + Onboarding is concierge-assisted, and switching from Carta includes a free trial with your data already loaded
Cons
- – No free plan. Even a 25-stakeholder cap table costs $1,200/year
- – Stakeholder caps mean you can outgrow Startup or Growth and get pushed into a quote-only Enterprise tier

Ledgy is the tool most often positioned against Carta for European companies, and it backs that up with a genuinely free Launch plan covering up to 50 stakeholders, not a trial. That plan includes cap table management, equity plan automation, and employee dashboards, though support is self-serve only. Past 50 stakeholders, every tier (Scale, Enterprise, Public) is a custom quote, though Ledgy's own site gives a rough floor of about 4,000 euros a year for Scale. Scale adds 70+ HRIS integrations, a vesting tranche builder with performance conditions, and DocuSign, and the Public tier extends into share plan administration for listed companies, which most competitors here don't touch. Reviewers consistently rate it easier to use and better value than Carta. The gaps are no phone support or 24/7 coverage, and some limits on bulk editing and custom reporting compared to larger platforms. For a European buyer or anyone who wants a real free tier past 25 stakeholders, Ledgy is the closest match.
Pros
- + Launch plan is genuinely free for up to 50 stakeholders, not a time-limited trial
- + Covers both private cap table management and public company share plan administration on one platform
- + 70+ HRIS integrations and a vesting tranche builder with performance conditions on the Scale tier
Cons
- – No public pricing past the free tier. Every paid plan requires a sales conversation to get a number
- – No phone support and no round-the-clock bot coverage, which reviewers flag as a gap for teams outside European working hours

Mantle takes a different angle on the Carta problem: instead of competing on which stakeholder tier is cheapest, it charges a flat annual fee that doesn't move when you add people. The free Starter plan includes unlimited stakeholders, SAFE signing, vesting schedules, and cap table exports, no cap at all. Essentials is $1,200/year for e-signing, board actions, and option exercising, and Growth is $3,000/year with one 409A valuation bundled in and VIP support. All three prices are posted, no sales call needed. Mantle also shipped Mantle Clerk, an AI assistant that reads legal documents like offer letters and board resolutions and drafts the resulting cap table updates. The downsides: no monthly billing, only annual, some users report an irritating login-link-only auth flow instead of persistent sessions, and it's missing a stock-based compensation calculator that bigger platforms include. For teams that expect to keep growing headcount and don't want that growth to cost more, Mantle is the pick.
Pros
- + Free Starter plan includes unlimited stakeholders, not a capped trial
- + Flat annual pricing means adding employees or advisors doesn't push you into a higher tier
- + All three prices are public on the pricing page, no sales call needed
Cons
- – No monthly billing, only annual, so you commit for a full year to get off the free plan
- – Some users report Mantle emails a fresh login link every time you access the account rather than a persistent session

Cake Equity covers the same core job as Carta, cap table, SAFEs, option grants, vesting, e-signing, and 409A valuations, priced by stakeholder count rather than a flat per-seat fee. The free plan covers up to 5 stakeholders with real cap table and SAFE features, not a demo. Build is $1,000/year for up to 25 stakeholders, and Team at $2,750/year bundles two 409A valuations a year plus a custom contract editor, which most competitors sell as separate line items. My Cake, its employee portal, lets staff see and exercise their own vesting without going through finance. The catch is that costs climb fast past the included stakeholder count, $5 per extra person on Team, and the top Pro tier is quote-only like Carta's higher plans. Reviewers also note the option distribution workflow takes real effort to learn. For very early founder-heavy cap tables that want 409A bundled in early, Cake Equity is a solid, cheaper starting point.
Pros
- + Free plan covers up to 5 stakeholders with real cap table, options, and SAFE features, not just a demo
- + Team plan bundles two 409A valuations a year instead of billing them separately
- + My Cake portal gives employees a place to see and exercise their own equity
Cons
- – Cost climbs fast once you pass the included stakeholder count: $5 per extra stakeholder on Team adds up for larger teams
- – Top Pro tier is quote-only, so you can't compare it against competitors without a sales call

Eqvista's pitch is doing the cap table and the 409A valuation under one roof, with its own NACVA-certified analysts producing the valuation instead of routing you to an outside firm. The Freemium tier covers real cap table and ESOP management under 20 stakeholders with no credit card required. Premium Cap Table is $2 per stakeholder per month, and the 409A bundle starts at $990/year pre-revenue, stepping up to $2,590 at Series A, with unlimited valuation updates and renewals included in the price rather than billed per report. That's the cheapest published per-seat number of any tool in this set. The tradeoffs: pricing goes custom once you pass 50 stakeholders or hit Series B, support is email-only with no live chat or phone, and one reviewer reported being billed for a month after cancelling with no refund. For cost-sensitive early-stage teams that want cap table and 409A from a single, transparently priced vendor, Eqvista is worth a look.
Pros
- + Freemium tier covers real cap table and ESOP management under 20 stakeholders with no credit card, not just a demo
- + 409A valuation is done in-house and bundled with the cap table, so you're not paying a separate valuation firm on top of separate cap table software
- + 409A bundle includes unlimited updates and renewals for the year instead of billing per refresh
Cons
- – 409A pricing steps up by funding stage ($990 to $2,590) rather than a single flat rate, so the number you see in ads isn't necessarily yours
- – Support has no live chat or phone option, only email

Vestd solves a different version of the Carta problem: it's built for UK companies running EMI, CSOP, growth share, or unapproved option schemes, with HMRC valuations and submissions handled inside the platform rather than through 409A-style US workflows. There's no free tier. Self-Serve is 2,200 pounds a year but is only sold to existing customers, and Guided at 4,200 pounds a year adds scheme setup support, unlimited valuations, and live HMRC submission support. Every plan carries a 12-month minimum term with VAT on top, and Full Service is quote-only. Direct Companies House integration for filings is a real advantage for UK founders, and reviewers consistently praise the account management and support. Capterra reviewers do call the pricing high relative to other cap table tools, and the Self-Serve plan's name is a bit misleading since some reviewers say it still needs legal know-how to run. For a UK company whose main need is EMI or CSOP compliance rather than 409A, Vestd is the closest fit, not a general Carta substitute for everyone else.
Pros
- + Deep, UK-specific coverage of EMI, CSOP, and growth share schemes, including live HMRC submission support
- + Direct Companies House integration for filings and share movements
- + Support and account management get consistently strong marks in reviews
Cons
- – Every plan requires a 12-month minimum commitment, with no month-to-month option
- – Reviewers on Capterra repeatedly call the pricing high relative to other cap table tools
Carta alternatives: FAQ
What is the best free alternative to Carta?+
Mantle's Starter plan is free with unlimited stakeholders and no cap forcing an upgrade. Ledgy's Launch plan is also free, capped at 50 stakeholders, and leans more European.
Which Carta alternative is best for European startups?+
Ledgy is built around EU and UK equity and compliance rules, offers a free plan to 50 stakeholders, and is frequently cited by reviewers as better value than Carta for European teams specifically.
Do Carta alternatives include 409A valuations?+
Most do. Pulley includes 409A on its Growth plan, Cake Equity bundles two a year into Team, Eqvista sells 409A as an annual bundle starting at $990, and Mantle includes one on its Growth plan. Vestd uses UK HMRC valuations instead of US-style 409A.
Is switching off Carta worth it just to see real pricing?+
It depends on your stakeholder count and whether you've already hit a rough renewal. Pulley, Cake Equity, Eqvista, and Mantle all publish real numbers on their sites, so you can compare them against an actual Carta quote before deciding whether the migration effort is worth it.
Carta alternatives: pricing compared
Entry price, billing model, and whether pricing is public. 5 of 7 publish pricing you can check without talking to sales.
| Tool | Starting price | Billing | Free option | Pricing disclosed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carta | Free tier + custom | quote-only | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Pulley | $1200/seat/yr | tiered | No | Partly public |
| Ledgy | Free tier + custom | tiered | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Mantle | Free tier + custom | tiered | Yes | Partly public |
| Cake Equity | $1000/yr | tiered | Yes | Partly public |
| Eqvista | $2/seat/mo | tiered | Yes | Public |
| Vestd | GBP 2200/seat/yr | tiered | No | Partly public |
How we made these picks. We compare tools on public pricing, features, and hands-on assessment, then verify every price against the vendor's own page. We never accept payment for rankings. Read the full methodology. Spotted an error? Report it.