Top Mantle Alternatives in 2026
Here for Mantle itself? See the full Mantle profile, pricing & reviews →
Suggest a change- If you need your cap table format to be instantly recognizable to VCs, auditors, and 409A reviewers, choose Carta. it's the market default, so most investors and lawyers already know how to read a Carta cap table, even though pricing past its free tier is quote-only and reviewers describe steep renewal jumps.
- If you want Mantle's flat-annual-fee logic but need 409A valuations, option exercises, and Rule 701 or Form 3921 compliance bundled into that same fixed price, choose Pulley. Pulley's Growth tier is a published $3,500 a year that includes 409A valuations plus Rule 701 and Form 3921 compliance work Mantle doesn't offer at any tier. Mantle only bundles one 409A valuation into its own Growth plan, and extra ones cost $1,800 each.
- If you're a UK company running EMI, CSOP, or growth share schemes, choose Vestd. Vestd is built around UK tax schemes and live HMRC valuation submissions, a job Mantle's US-first product doesn't cover at all.
- If you're a European company that wants EU-first compliance workflows and HRIS integrations built into a still-free plan, even though it caps out well below Mantle's unlimited free tier, choose Ledgy. Ledgy's Launch plan is free for up to 50 stakeholders and adds EU-first compliance workflows, though every plan past that is a custom quote rather than a published price.
- If you're a very early founder who just needs a real free cap table with unlimited stakeholders and doesn't need EU or UK-specific tooling, choose stay on Mantle. no alternative here matches Mantle's combination of a genuinely free plan, unlimited stakeholders on that plan, and flat annual pricing that doesn't rise with headcount.
Mantle's whole pitch is a flat annual fee instead of the per-stakeholder pricing most cap table tools charge. Starter is free forever with unlimited stakeholders, and the paid tiers ($1,200 and $3,000 a year) don't move if you hire more people or bring on advisors. That works well for an early founder who wants a real cap table without a per-seat bill creeping up every quarter.
The six tools below are the ones a Mantle buyer actually cross-shops: cap table platforms that also handle SAFEs, vesting, option grants, and 409A valuations for private companies. Some match Mantle's free-tier generosity, some bundle 409A valuations more cheaply, and one is built specifically for UK share schemes Mantle doesn't touch at all. None of them copy Mantle's exact flat-annual-fee model outright, so the tradeoffs below are about what you gain and give up by leaving it.
Mantle alternatives compared
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free option | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PulleyBest flat-fee match for Mantle's model | Early-stage startups that want a straightforward cap table without Carta's reputation for aggressive upsells | $1200/seat/yr | No | October 2025 |
| Cake Equity | Early-stage startups that want a free or low-cost cap table before they need 409A valuations | $1000/yr | Yes | July 2026 |
| LedgyBest free alternative | European startups that want a cap table platform built around EU/UK equity and compliance rules rather than a US-first product | Free tier + custom | Yes | April 2026 |
| Carta | Very early companies under 25 stakeholders and $1M raised that qualify for the free Launch plan | Free tier + custom | Yes | April 2026 |
| EqvistaBest for the most 409A refreshes per year | Early-stage founders who want cap table software and their 409A valuation from the same vendor instead of coordinating two | $2/seat/mo | Yes | May 2026 |
| VestdBest for UK companies | UK companies running EMI, CSOP, or growth share schemes who want HMRC valuations and submissions handled inside the same platform | GBP 2200/seat/yr | No | June 2026 |
Why teams switch from Mantle
Logging in requires a fresh emailed access link every time instead of a persistent session
Some users find it irritating that Mantle emails a new access link on each login rather than keeping a normal session, a recurring friction point for daily use.
Missing finance-team tools that larger competitors already include
Reviewers note Mantle lacks a stock-based compensation calculator and similar finance-team tooling that platforms like Carta already have built in.
No monthly billing option on any paid plan
Mantle only bills annually, so moving off the free Starter plan means committing to a full year up front rather than testing a paid tier month to month.
Extra 409A valuations are expensive once you need more than one a year
Only the Growth plan bundles one 409A valuation a year. Any additional valuation costs $1,800, whether you're on Growth or a lower tier.
The best Mantle alternatives, ranked

Pulley is the closest structural match to Mantle: both charge a flat fee per plan tier rather than a per-seat price, and both were built specifically to undercut Carta's model. Startup is $1,200 a year for your first 25 stakeholders, covering cap table management, e-signing, and fundraise modeling. Growth, at $3,500 a year for 40 stakeholders, bundles 409A valuations, option exercises, and Rule 701 and Form 3921 compliance work that Mantle only unlocks at the Growth tier for 409A and doesn't offer for the rest. The gap is that Pulley has no free plan at all, so even a small cap table costs $1,200 a year from day one, and note conversion during a large financing round is handled one note at a time. If switching from Carta, Pulley's onboarding includes a data migration trial, a detail worth knowing if that's part of your move.
Pros
- + Both paid tiers show real numbers on the pricing page instead of forcing a sales call for basic cap table access
- + 409A valuations and option exercises are included in Growth rather than sold as costly add-ons
- + Onboarding is concierge-assisted, and switching from Carta includes a free trial with your data already loaded
Cons
- – No free plan. Even a 25-stakeholder cap table costs $1,200/year
- – Stakeholder caps mean you can outgrow Startup or Growth and get pushed into a quote-only Enterprise tier

Cake Equity prices by stakeholder count rather than a flat fee, but its free tier (up to 5 stakeholders) and Team plan ($2,750 a year, up to 40 stakeholders) land close to Mantle's price points while including two 409A valuations a year on Team, cheaper than paying for extra valuations on Mantle Growth at $1,800 each. Cake also gives employees their own portal, My Cake, to view vesting and exercise options, something Mantle doesn't call out as a dedicated feature. The catch is that costs climb once you pass the included stakeholder count: $1 per extra person on Build and $5 per extra on Team, so a fast-growing team can end up paying more than Mantle's flat rate. The top Pro tier is quote-only, same limitation as most of this list.
Pros
- + Free plan covers up to 5 stakeholders with real cap table, options, and SAFE features, not just a demo
- + Team plan bundles two 409A valuations a year instead of billing them separately
- + My Cake portal gives employees a place to see and exercise their own equity
Cons
- – Cost climbs fast once you pass the included stakeholder count: $5 per extra stakeholder on Team adds up for larger teams
- – Top Pro tier is quote-only, so you can't compare it against competitors without a sales call

Ledgy's free Launch plan covers up to 50 stakeholders, more room than Mantle's unlimited-but-feature-light Starter plan before you need e-signing or board actions. Past Launch, every tier (Scale, Enterprise, Public) requires a sales quote, with Ledgy's own site suggesting Scale starts around €4k a year, a jump from Mantle's published $1,200 Essentials price. What Ledgy adds that Mantle doesn't is depth for European companies: 70+ HRIS integrations, a vesting tranche builder with performance conditions, and a Public tier for listed-company share plan administration. It's also picked up a reputation, per reviewer comments, as an easier and better-value move for teams leaving Carta specifically. The tradeoff outside Europe is support: no phone line and no round-the-clock coverage.
Pros
- + Launch plan is genuinely free for up to 50 stakeholders, not a time-limited trial
- + Covers both private cap table management and public company share plan administration on one platform
- + 70+ HRIS integrations and a vesting tranche builder with performance conditions on the Scale tier
Cons
- – No public pricing past the free tier. Every paid plan requires a sales conversation to get a number
- – No phone support and no round-the-clock bot coverage, which reviewers flag as a gap for teams outside European working hours
Carta

Carta is the name most VCs, lawyers, and auditors already expect to see, which is a real reason to cross-shop it even though its pricing is the opposite of Mantle's transparency. The free Launch plan only covers companies under 25 stakeholders and $1M raised, tighter than Mantle's unlimited-stakeholder free tier. Every paid plan past that, Build, Grow, and Scale, is a custom quote with no published number, and third-party reviews describe unannounced renewal jumps, including one account moving from $99 to $3,000. What you get for that opacity is a full stack under one vendor: 409A valuations, ASC 718 and IFRS reporting, transfer agent services, and now an AI plugin for querying your own cap table in plain language. Worth it mainly if investor and auditor familiarity outweighs price certainty.
Pros
- + Free Launch plan is genuinely free, not a trial, for companies under 25 stakeholders and $1M raised
- + Acts as its own SEC-registered transfer agent, so option exercises and share transfers happen without a separate vendor
- + 409A valuations, ASC 718 audit support, and IPO advisory are all available as add-ons under one account, useful once a company outgrows basic cap table needs
Cons
- – No public pricing past the free tier. You have to book a demo and negotiate a quote to know what you'll pay
- – Customer reviews describe steep, unannounced renewal increases, in one case pricing moving from $99 to $3,000

Eqvista prices its cap table software per stakeholder ($2/month on Premium) rather than Mantle's flat annual fee, which makes it cheaper for a small team but costlier than Mantle's flat rate as headcount grows. Its real differentiator is doing 409A valuations in-house through its own NACVA-certified analysts, bundled with unlimited updates and renewals for the year at a price that steps up by funding stage, from $990 pre-revenue to $2,590 at Series A. That in-house valuation model is worth knowing if Mantle's $1,800 per extra 409A (beyond the one bundled with Growth) feels expensive for a company that needs more than one refresh a year. Support is email-only, and pricing goes custom past 50 stakeholders or Series B.
Pros
- + Freemium tier covers real cap table and ESOP management under 20 stakeholders with no credit card, not just a demo
- + 409A valuation is done in-house and bundled with the cap table, so you're not paying a separate valuation firm on top of separate cap table software
- + 409A bundle includes unlimited updates and renewals for the year instead of billing per refresh
Cons
- – 409A pricing steps up by funding stage ($990 to $2,590) rather than a single flat rate, so the number you see in ads isn't necessarily yours
- – Support has no live chat or phone option, only email

Vestd isn't a general substitute for Mantle, it's the pick if your company runs on UK equity law. It handles EMI, CSOP, and growth share schemes with live HMRC valuation submissions and direct Companies House integration, none of which Mantle's US-first product touches. There's no free tier at all, the cheapest published plan (Self-Serve, £2,200/year) is only sold to existing customers, and every plan carries a 12-month minimum term with VAT on top, a much stiffer commitment than Mantle's own annual-only billing. Reviewers consistently call the pricing high relative to other cap table tools, but also credit the account management and legal templates for making the higher cost worth it if UK scheme compliance is the job you actually need done.
Pros
- + Deep, UK-specific coverage of EMI, CSOP, and growth share schemes, including live HMRC submission support
- + Direct Companies House integration for filings and share movements
- + Support and account management get consistently strong marks in reviews
Cons
- – Every plan requires a 12-month minimum commitment, with no month-to-month option
- – Reviewers on Capterra repeatedly call the pricing high relative to other cap table tools
Mantle alternatives: FAQ
What's the best free alternative to Mantle?+
Ledgy's Launch plan is free for up to 50 stakeholders and includes cap table management and equity plan automation, though support on that tier is self-serve only.
Is there a Mantle alternative built for UK companies?+
Vestd is built specifically around UK equity law, covering EMI, CSOP, and growth share schemes with live HMRC valuation submissions, none of which Mantle's US-first product handles.
Which alternative is cheapest for a small cap table?+
Eqvista's Freemium tier covers cap table and ESOP management free under 20 stakeholders, and its Premium tier is $2 per stakeholder per month after that, among the lowest published per-seat prices in this group.
Should I switch from Mantle to Carta?+
Only if investor, lawyer, or auditor familiarity with Carta's specific format outweighs price certainty. Carta's paid plans are quote-only and reviewers describe sharp, unannounced renewal increases, while Mantle publishes all three of its prices.
Mantle alternatives: pricing compared
Entry price, billing model, and whether pricing is public. 5 of 7 publish pricing you can check without talking to sales.
| Tool | Starting price | Billing | Free option | Pricing disclosed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mantle | Free tier + custom | tiered | Yes | Partly public |
| Pulley | $1200/seat/yr | tiered | No | Partly public |
| Cake Equity | $1000/yr | tiered | Yes | Partly public |
| Ledgy | Free tier + custom | tiered | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Carta | Free tier + custom | quote-only | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Eqvista | $2/seat/mo | tiered | Yes | Public |
| Vestd | GBP 2200/seat/yr | tiered | No | Partly public |
How we made these picks. We compare tools on public pricing, features, and hands-on assessment, then verify every price against the vendor's own page. We never accept payment for rankings. Read the full methodology. Spotted an error? Report it.