Top Frontegg Alternatives in 2026
Here for Frontegg itself? See the full Frontegg profile, pricing & reviews →
Suggest a change- If you want published, per-connection SSO and SCIM prices instead of an undisclosed overage rate, choose WorkOS. WorkOS lists exact per-connection prices for SSO and directory sync, stepping down at volume, while Frontegg publishes no overage rate at all past its free tier.
- If you want the most established, Okta-backed platform with the widest published tier ladder, choose Auth0. Auth0 publishes named B2C and B2B tiers with MAU-based pricing up to a stated point, giving more visible structure than Frontegg's plain free-or-custom split.
- If you want to own the login UI yourself while keeping per-tenant SSO/SCIM and an admin portal, choose Stytch. Stytch is API-first with a larger free MAU allowance than Frontegg and gives customers a self-service admin portal for their own SSO and SCIM connections.
- If you want fine-grained authorization and AI-agent identity bundled into the base product instead of sold as a separate add-on, choose stay on Frontegg. Auth0 also offers fine-grained authorization and an AI Agents product, but Auth0 sells both as paid add-ons on top of its tiers. Frontegg bundles equivalent entitlements and its AgentLink/FrontMCP agent-identity tooling into the base platform, so you're not paying extra to turn them on.
Frontegg bundles login, B2B organizations, SSO/SCIM, and fine-grained entitlements into one platform, with a free tier that covers 7,500 monthly active users and 5 enterprise connections. Most teams that leave do it over price. Frontegg publishes no overage rate past the free tier, so you can't model cost at scale without a sales call.
The alternatives below all handle the same core job, hosted login, signup, and user management with B2B SSO and SCIM directory sync, but they split on how transparent their pricing is and how much UI they hand you out of the box. Clerk and SuperTokens are also common Frontegg alternatives for teams that don't need SCIM, but their own product docs show no SCIM support today, so they're left off this SCIM-focused ranking.
Frontegg alternatives compared
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free option | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WorkOSBest for pricing transparency | Developers who expect enterprise customers to demand SSO and SCIM directory sync and don't want to build IdP integrations themselves | Free | Yes | July 2026 |
| Auth0Best for enterprise maturity | Teams that need enterprise SSO and SCIM provisioning for business customers, not just consumer login | $35/user/mo | Yes | July 2026 |
| StytchBest for owning your own login UI | Developers who want full control over the login UI and are fine wiring up an API rather than an embedded widget | Free | Yes | October 2025 |
Why teams switch from Frontegg
No published price past the free tier
Frontegg's pricing page doesn't list an overage rate for extra monthly active users or extra SSO/SCIM connections beyond the free 7,500 MAU and 5 connections, so budgeting for growth requires a sales call.
Only two plans, with nothing between free and custom Enterprise
Premium support and multi-environment setups are only available on the quote-only Enterprise plan, leaving no published mid-tier option for growing teams.
The best Frontegg alternatives, ranked

WorkOS is the closest match to Frontegg's core pitch: get enterprise SSO and SCIM without building the identity provider integrations yourself. Where Frontegg goes vague past its free tier, WorkOS publishes exact numbers. Core login and user management is free up to 1 million monthly active users, then $2,500 a month per additional million, and enterprise add-ons are priced per feature. SSO and directory sync each cost $125 per connection per month, stepping down to $65 at 51-100 connections, so you can model your bill before you sign a customer. The tradeoff is that pricing is split across many separate line items, MAUs, SSO connections, directory sync, audit logs, and Radar checks, so there's no single number to quote a finance team. Still, for a Frontegg buyer whose main complaint is not knowing what they'll pay at scale, WorkOS answers that directly.
Pros
- + Core login and user management is free up to 1M monthly active users, so most apps pay nothing until they have real scale
- + SSO and directory sync pricing scales down per connection as you add more enterprise customers, up to 48% off once you reach 51-100 connections
- + AuthKit gives you a hosted, customizable login page so you don't have to design and maintain your own auth screens
Cons
- – Pricing is split across many separate metered items (MAUs, SSO connections, directory sync connections, audit log streams and retention, Radar checks, custom domain), so there's no single number that tells you what you'll pay
- – Each SSO connection still costs $125/month at low volume, which adds up fast if you sign many small enterprise customers who each bring their own identity provider

Auth0 is the safest, most established alternative, now backed by Okta's infrastructure and support. Like Frontegg it splits pricing into consumer (B2C) and business (B2B) tracks, with organizations, SSO, and SCIM built into the B2B Essentials and Professional tiers rather than sold separately. The free plan covers 25,000 monthly active users with real SSO and SCIM included, more headroom than Frontegg's 7,500. But the free plan only includes 1 enterprise connection, versus 5 on Frontegg's free tier, and adding more requires upgrading to a paid B2B tier at $100 per connection per month. Named tiers are published with MAU-based pricing up to a point, B2B Essentials starts near $150 a month and reaches $2,100 a month at 10,000 MAUs, so you get more visible structure than Frontegg's plain free-or-custom split. Auth0 also lists fine-grained authorization as a key feature and sells an AI Agents add-on, so it isn't far behind Frontegg on either front, the difference is that Auth0 prices both as separate paid add-ons (alongside extra SSO connections and MFA) rather than folding them into the base tiers the way Frontegg does. The other catch is the same one that pushes people off Frontegg: past the top published tier you land on quote-only Enterprise pricing, and Auth0 customers have reported that jump landing far higher than expected. Choose Auth0 for maturity and Okta backing, not for pricing predictability at true scale.
Pros
- + Free plan covers up to 25,000 monthly active users with real features (SSO, SCIM), not just a stripped-down trial
- + Separate B2C and B2B tracks match pricing to how the app is actually used
- + Backed by Okta's infrastructure, with published uptime and attack-blocking numbers
Cons
- – Per-MAU pricing gets expensive fast once you cross a few thousand users, especially on the B2B track
- – Several needed pieces (extra SSO connections, MFA, AI Agents) are separate paid add-ons, not included in the base tiers

Stytch is the pick for teams that want to build their own login screens against a clean API rather than embed someone else's UI, while still getting Frontegg-style B2B features: organizations, per-tenant SSO/SCIM, and an admin portal customers can use to manage their own connections. Its free tier covers 10,000 monthly active users and 5 SSO/SCIM connections, matching Frontegg's connection count with more free usage headroom. Like Frontegg, Stytch doesn't publish its core overage rate, you get a quote once you're past the free tier, though it does post exact prices for extra SSO/SCIM connections ($125 a month each) and fraud-check add-ons. Stytch also bundles device fingerprinting for bot and fraud detection free up to 10,000 fingerprints, which Frontegg only offers on its quote-only Enterprise tier, not in its free plan. Stytch's free tier does include RBAC, so it isn't a bare-bones alternative on authorization, but it stops short of Frontegg's deeper fine-grained entitlements and authorization layer, so if that's why you picked Frontegg, Stytch covers less ground. Twilio acquired Stytch in October 2025, which adds uncertainty about long-term pricing and how independent its product roadmap stays.
Pros
- + Free tier covers 10,000 MAU with core features like SSO, RBAC, and sessions, not a crippled trial
- + Clean, well-documented API with SDKs for most major frameworks
- + B2B product handles multi-tenant SSO/SCIM and org management out of the box, which most competitors bolt on later
Cons
- – The real cost past the free tier isn't public. You only see two specific overage fees (SSO/SCIM connections, fraud fingerprints); the core per-MAU rate requires a sales conversation
- – Extra SSO/SCIM connections cost $125/connection/month, which adds up fast if you sell to many enterprise customers each needing their own connection
Frontegg alternatives: FAQ
What's the best Frontegg alternative for pricing transparency?+
WorkOS, since it publishes exact per-connection prices for SSO and directory sync instead of Frontegg's undisclosed overage rate past the free tier.
What's the best free alternative to Frontegg?+
WorkOS's free AuthKit tier covers up to 1 million monthly active users, far more than Frontegg's 7,500, though enterprise features like SSO still cost extra.
Which Frontegg alternative is best for teams that want a self-hosted option?+
None of the SSO/SCIM-focused alternatives ranked here are self-hostable. If you don't need SCIM and want to self-host, SuperTokens is free and open source with no MAU cap, though its own docs don't document SCIM directory sync.
Which alternative has the most mature B2B SSO and SCIM features?+
Auth0 and WorkOS both have dedicated B2B tracks with organizations, SSO, and SCIM. WorkOS prices those features per connection with public rates, while Auth0 bundles them into its B2B Essentials and Professional tiers by MAU.
Frontegg alternatives: pricing compared
Entry price, billing model, and whether pricing is public. 3 of 4 publish pricing you can check without talking to sales.
How we made these picks. We compare tools on public pricing, features, and hands-on assessment, then verify every price against the vendor's own page. We never accept payment for rankings. Read the full methodology. Spotted an error? Report it.