Top Auth0 Alternatives in 2026
Here for Auth0 itself? See the full Auth0 profile, pricing & reviews →
Suggest a change- If you're building a Next.js or React app and want working login today with almost no custom UI code, choose Clerk. its prebuilt sign-in and sign-up components drop into your app directly and the free Hobby plan covers 50,000 monthly retained users.
- If your Auth0 bill grew because of enterprise SSO connections or the B2B pricing track, choose WorkOS. core login is free up to 1 million monthly active users and SSO is billed per identity provider connection instead of folded into a pricier B2B tier.
- If you want to own your login screens and call an API directly rather than embed someone else's widget, choose Stytch. it's built API-first and its free tier includes SSO, RBAC, and sessions for the first 10,000 monthly active users.
- If you want to get off per-monthly-active-user billing for your core login system entirely, choose SuperTokens. the open-source core is free to self-host with no user cap, something none of the hosted alternatives offer.
- If you're a B2B SaaS team that wants organizations, hierarchies, and fine-grained entitlements built in alongside login, choose Frontegg. it bundles authorization and entitlements as core features rather than treating them as separate paid modules.
- If you're already on Google Cloud and want the cheapest possible login rather than a dedicated CIAM product, choose Firebase. Firebase Authentication is free up to 50,000 monthly active users and comes bundled with the database, storage, and hosting most Google Cloud teams already use.
- If you already rely on Auth0's Actions for custom login logic and have negotiated Okta-backed enterprise support, choose stay on Auth0. none of the alternatives match Auth0's combination of Okta-backed infrastructure, published uptime numbers, and an established Actions ecosystem for custom login logic.
Auth0 covers a lot of ground: hosted login, social and enterprise SSO, MFA, and B2B org management, all backed by Okta's infrastructure. Most teams that go looking for an alternative aren't unhappy with what Auth0 does, they're unhappy with what it costs once monthly active users climb or an enterprise customer asks for SSO. That's not an entry-level problem: Auth0's Free plan covers up to 25,000 MAU at no cost, no credit card required, and includes SSO and SCIM. The real pain starts once you cross onto the paid Essentials or Professional tiers, or hit the quote-only Enterprise cliff. One long-time customer described getting pushed from a roughly $1,138/month legacy plan to an $8,000/month Enterprise quote after the Okta acquisition, with no option to keep the old pricing.
The alternatives below all do the same core job, hosted or API-based login, signup, and user management, but split the tradeoffs differently: some publish every price down to the overage rate, some let you self-host to avoid per-user billing entirely, and some specialize harder on the enterprise SSO piece that made Auth0 expensive in the first place. Firebase is included too, for teams already on Google Cloud who want the cheapest possible login rather than a dedicated CIAM product. See the FAQ for why AWS Cognito and self-host options like Ory, Descope, and FusionAuth aren't ranked here.
Auth0 alternatives compared
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free option | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClerkBest drop-in developer experience | Teams shipping a Next.js, React, or similar app that want working login and user management on day one | $25/mo | Yes | July 2026 |
| WorkOSBest free tier at scale | Developers who expect enterprise customers to demand SSO and SCIM directory sync and don't want to build IdP integrations themselves | Free | Yes | July 2026 |
| StytchBest API-first option | Developers who want full control over the login UI and are fine wiring up an API rather than an embedded widget | Free | Yes | October 2025 |
| SuperTokensBest for avoiding per-user billing | Teams that want to self-host auth and keep user data on their own infrastructure | Free tier + custom | Yes | May 2026 |
| Frontegg | B2B SaaS teams that need SSO, SCIM, and org hierarchies for enterprise customers without building that layer themselves | Free tier + custom | Yes | November 2025 |
| FirebaseCheapest option if you're already on Google Cloud | Mobile-first apps (Android, iOS, Flutter) that want auth, a real-time database, and push notifications out of the box | Free tier + custom | Yes | July 2026 |
Why teams switch from Auth0
Enterprise pricing above the published MAU tiers is quote-only and can jump sharply
One long-time Auth0 customer wrote on Hacker News that Okta's acquisition of Auth0 pushed them from a legacy Developer plan (about $1,138/month for 50,000 MAUs) onto an Enterprise quote around $8,000/month, with no option to keep the old pricing.
Per-MAU pricing climbs fast once you cross a few thousand users, especially on the B2B track
At 10,000 MAUs, Auth0's B2C Essentials plan runs $700/month while the B2B Essentials plan for the same user count runs $2,100/month.
Several needed features are separate paid add-ons rather than included in the base plan
Extra enterprise SSO connections cost $100/month each on the B2B track, and Enterprise MFA is a $100/month add-on on B2B Essentials.
The best Auth0 alternatives, ranked

Clerk is the closest thing to Auth0 for teams that want working login on day one instead of building screens from scratch. It ships prebuilt sign-in, sign-up, and account management components that drop into a Next.js or React app with almost no custom UI work, a level of polish Auth0's Universal Login doesn't try to match. The free Hobby plan covers 50,000 monthly retained users (MRU), meaning users who actually come back a day later, which is more room than most teams need in their first year. The Pro plan includes one enterprise SSO connection, so a first B2B customer doesn't require an upgrade. The catch is that broader B2B org support, admin impersonation, and billing are each separate paid add-ons on top of that, most notably $100/month for B2B authentication covering 100 monthly retained organizations, and MRU-based costs climb once an app has real traffic.
Pros
- + Prebuilt UI components handle login, signup, and account management with little custom code
- + Free tier covers 50,000 monthly retained users, generous enough for most early-stage apps
- + Organizations, roles, and SAML SSO are built in for teams selling to other businesses
Cons
- – B2B features, admin tools, and built-in billing are all separate paid add-ons on top of the base plan
- – Costs scale with monthly retained users, so pricing can climb fast once an app has real usage

WorkOS answers the exact complaint most teams have about Auth0: enterprise SSO gets expensive fast. Core login and user management through AuthKit is free up to 1 million monthly active users, a ceiling most apps won't hit for years, compared with Auth0's own free tier, which tops out at 25,000 MAU. When you do need enterprise SSO or SCIM directory sync, WorkOS charges per identity provider connection, $125/month at low volume, dropping to $65/month past 50 connections, instead of pushing you onto a separate, pricier B2B tier the way Auth0's B2B Essentials and Professional plans do. AuthKit gives you a hosted, customizable login page and supports 20+ identity providers out of the box. The tradeoff is a pricing sheet split across MAUs, connections, audit log retention, and fraud checks, so there's no single number to budget against.
Pros
- + Core login and user management is free up to 1M monthly active users, so most apps pay nothing until they have real scale
- + SSO and directory sync pricing scales down per connection as you add more enterprise customers, up to 48% off once you reach 51-100 connections
- + AuthKit gives you a hosted, customizable login page so you don't have to design and maintain your own auth screens
Cons
- – Pricing is split across many separate metered items (MAUs, SSO connections, directory sync connections, audit log streams and retention, Radar checks, custom domain), so there's no single number that tells you what you'll pay
- – Each SSO connection still costs $125/month at low volume, which adds up fast if you sign many small enterprise customers who each bring their own identity provider

Stytch fits teams that want to own their login screens and call an API instead of dropping in someone else's components. It covers passwords, magic links, passkeys, OAuth, SAML/OIDC SSO, and machine-to-machine auth, with a free tier covering 10,000 monthly active users that includes SSO, RBAC, and sessions rather than a stripped-down trial. Its B2B product adds organizations and an embeddable admin portal so enterprise customers can manage their own SSO and SCIM setup, similar to what Auth0 offers on its B2B track but without splitting pricing into separate consumer and business plans. The real overage rate past the free tier isn't published, so budgeting at scale still means a sales call. Twilio's October 2025 acquisition adds some uncertainty about long-term roadmap independence.
Pros
- + Free tier covers 10,000 MAU with core features like SSO, RBAC, and sessions, not a crippled trial
- + Clean, well-documented API with SDKs for most major frameworks
- + B2B product handles multi-tenant SSO/SCIM and org management out of the box, which most competitors bolt on later
Cons
- – The real cost past the free tier isn't public. You only see two specific overage fees (SSO/SCIM connections, fraud fingerprints); the core per-MAU rate requires a sales conversation
- – Extra SSO/SCIM connections cost $125/connection/month, which adds up fast if you sell to many enterprise customers each needing their own connection

SuperTokens is the pick for teams that want to get off per-MAU billing entirely. The core login system, email/password, passwordless, social login, SSO, and multi-tenancy, is open source and free to self-host with no user cap, or you can run SuperTokens' managed cloud free up to 5,000 MAU. That's a direct answer to Auth0's model of charging for every monthly active user regardless of hosting. The Node.js SDK is solid and well liked, though the React SDK and the recipe-based docs get called harder to navigate than competitors' on Hacker News. MFA and account linking are billed per MAU with a $100/month minimum once turned on, while extra dashboard seats are a flat $20/user/month with the first 3 free, so basic auth is genuinely free but the extras aren't.
Pros
- + Core auth is genuinely free to self-host with no MAU limit, not just a trial
- + Node.js SDK is solid and most functions can be overridden for custom flows
- + Managed cloud free tier (5,000 MAU) is generous for early-stage products
Cons
- – MFA, account linking, and extra dashboard users are billed separately per MAU with a $100/month minimum each, so real cost adds up fast once you need more than basic login
- – Docs are built around a "recipes" abstraction that developers on Hacker News describe as confusing to search and navigate
Frontegg

Frontegg is built for B2B SaaS teams that want organizations, hierarchies, and fine-grained entitlements bundled with login instead of layered on as separate products. The free Pay as you go plan covers 7,500 monthly active users and 5 SSO/SCIM connections, enough to run an early enterprise motion without paying anything. It also covers machine-to-machine auth and, more recently, identity tooling for AI agents through AgentLink and FrontMCP. The gap compared with WorkOS or Auth0 is pricing transparency: Frontegg doesn't publish what usage past the free tier costs, so estimating your bill at scale means talking to sales. With only two named plans, free and custom Enterprise, there's no visible middle tier to compare against.
Pros
- + Free tier covers a real amount of usage: 7,500 monthly active users and 5 SSO/SCIM connections
- + B2B features like organizations, hierarchies, and entitlements are built in, not bolted-on add-ons
- + Covers machine-to-machine and AI agent identity use cases beyond plain end-user login
Cons
- – No published price past the free tier. Overage rates for extra MAUs and connections aren't on the pricing page, so you can't estimate cost at scale without a sales call
- – Only two named plans, so there's no visible middle tier between free and custom Enterprise pricing

Firebase isn't a dedicated CIAM product like the rest of this list, it's Google's full backend platform, but Firebase Authentication is the answer a lot of cost-sensitive teams land on when they just want login to be nearly free. The free Spark plan covers 50,000 monthly active users with email/password, phone, and social sign-in, and there's no self-service enterprise SSO or SCIM tier to buy into at all, unlike Auth0. That's the tradeoff: you get auth bundled with a real-time database, storage, and hosting in one console, but organizations, fine-grained roles, and enterprise SSO require Google's separate Identity Platform product with its own usage-based pricing rather than a simple upgrade. It's a fit for teams already building on Google Cloud, not a like-for-like Auth0 replacement for B2B SaaS.
Pros
- + Free Spark tier is real and usable for building and testing, not just a demo
- + Auth, database, storage, functions, hosting, and messaging all live in one console with one SDK
- + Deep, mature tooling for Android, iOS, Flutter, and Unity that most alternatives don't match
Cons
- – No flat-rate plan. Costs scale with reads, writes, storage, and bandwidth, so a bill can jump if usage spikes or a query pattern is inefficient
- – Firestore's per-read and per-write pricing means denormalizing data or fetching related records can multiply costs compared with a single SQL join
Auth0 alternatives: FAQ
What is the best free Auth0 alternative?+
WorkOS has the most generous free tier for core login, free up to 1 million monthly active users. Clerk's free Hobby plan covers 50,000 monthly retained users and includes prebuilt UI components, which matters more for teams that don't want to build their own login screens.
Is there an open source Auth0 alternative?+
SuperTokens is open source. You can self-host the core login system for free with no user cap, or use its managed cloud free up to 5,000 monthly active users.
Which Auth0 alternative is best for B2B SaaS that needs enterprise SSO?+
WorkOS specializes in this: SSO and SCIM directory sync are priced per identity provider connection with volume discounts, instead of being folded into a separate, more expensive B2B pricing track the way Auth0 does. Frontegg and Stytch also cover B2B SSO with generous free connection counts.
Why do teams leave Auth0?+
The most common reasons are per-MAU pricing that climbs fast on the B2B track, needed features like extra SSO connections and MFA being separate paid add-ons, and Enterprise pricing above the published tiers being quote-only and sometimes far more expensive than the previous plan. This isn't about Auth0's Free plan, which covers up to 25,000 MAU with SSO and SCIM included; the pain shows up once a team scales past it.
What about AWS Cognito or self-hosting with Ory, Descope, or FusionAuth?+
They come up in the same 'Auth0 is too expensive' threads as the options above, and Cognito in particular is a genuinely cheap choice if you're already on AWS. We've left them off this ranking because we don't yet have a verified profile for any of them on this site, not because they're bad options. Cognito and self-hosted Ory both tend to cost less at the extremes than Auth0 or the vendors above, but they also mean more setup work: fewer prebuilt UI components, and no organizations or SCIM out of the box the way WorkOS, Stytch, and Frontegg offer.
Auth0 alternatives: pricing compared
Entry price, billing model, and whether pricing is public. 4 of 7 publish pricing you can check without talking to sales.
| Tool | Starting price | Billing | Free option | Pricing disclosed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auth0 | $35/user/mo | tiered | Yes | Partly public |
| Clerk | $25/mo | tiered | Yes | Partly public |
| WorkOS | Free | usage-based | Yes | Partly public |
| Stytch | Free | usage-based | Yes | Partly public |
| SuperTokens | Free tier + custom | usage-based | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Frontegg | Free tier + custom | usage-based | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Firebase | Free tier + custom | usage-based | Yes | Not disclosed |
How we made these picks. We compare tools on public pricing, features, and hands-on assessment, then verify every price against the vendor's own page. We never accept payment for rankings. Read the full methodology. Spotted an error? Report it.